Remington 700 Settlement : File Your Claim now


You have 18 months, so do it now so you don't forget. What you get is a free trigger replacement if your rifle has the old style Remington 700 ("Walker") trigger or a certain version of the X Mark Pro trigger. To have Remington fix your gun for free, go here and follow the prompts to file online:

http://remingtonfirearmsclassactionsettlement.com/

The guns covered are Remington Model 700, Seven, Sportsman 78, 673, 710, 715, 770, 600, 660, XP-100, 721, 722, and 725.

The problem is some examples of these guns firing when the trigger is not pulled. Surely you do not want that to happen. Quit using your Remmies. Send them in for the free overhaul.

Background on this story: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/10/24/remington-rifle-settlement-is-official.html

More: http://www.captainsjournal.com/2018/10/24/the-remington-rifle-settlement-is-final/

I gave this story some coverage in the past, saying that I would send in my rifle, but also pointing out that media coverage may have given an exaggerated idea of the prevalence of the problem, and little or no attention to possible contributing factors in the accidents reported. I also pointed out that uncommanded firing can occur in other brands. It may be that other lawsuits, against smaller makers, will be along in the wake of this successful settlement. A cynical view of the matter is that giant Remington was singled out for their deep pockets.

I noted in my past coverage that the Marine Corps encountered the problem. (Their M40 and its variants are 700's adapted to the Corps's preferences.) They addressed the matter by telling the grunts to quit messing with the trigger settings. It is a mistake for Marines (or anyone else) to try to make a hair trigger out of a field trigger. It is not necessary for good accuracy and it is not safe. Another possible contributing problem is dirt, gummed oil and so on: Cleanliness is related to functionality, in any gun.

In any event, Remington is replacing the triggers with something new and improved, so get on board. Remington has not acknowledged blame but settled to avoid further litigation.  That, I find, is a common face-saving way for product lawsuits to end.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A moldy oldie review: The Singlepoint sight

Image
"I don't know just what it is, but I'll let you have it cheap." So said the fellow at the gun show, and that is how I came to have this thing in my collection. The Singlepoint is an ancestor of today's red dot sights. It created a stir back in the seventies. It was discussed in the English  Parliament . Its moment of fame came on the Son Tay  raid in the Vietnam war. It even got writeups in  Popular Mechanics  and  Popular Science , honors reserved for things that were maximally cool. By modern standards, though, it's a pathetic gunsight. It was a good try for its time, no doubt. It is an occluded eye gunsight (OEG), meaning you can't see through it. When you look in the end you see a black field with a red dot floating in it. You look at the target with your other eye and your brain merges the two images into one. Thus, you see the red dot superimposed upon the target. Well, sort of. It doesn't work perfectly. The effects of  pho...
Read more

Classic gun review: First generation Thompson Center Contender

Image
Including a pictorial on how to change barrels The Contender is a break action single shot. You can set up the gun as a pistol or carbine, depending on your tastes. Barrels are interchangeable and available in many calibers. The gun reviewed is an older model, made in the seventies. There is a more recent "G2" second generation model with numerous changes to the mechanism. In between the early model shown and the present G2, there were several variations in parts and design, most significantly a redesign of the barrel latch to make the gun easier to open. The review gun lacks the easy-open feature. More about that later. The Contender figured in a  Supreme Court case , which established that having a pistol and parts to convert it to a rifle did not amount to possession of an illegal short barreled rifle. Thus in a small way the Contender has a place in gun rights history. Of course, it is still illegal to assemble the pistol barrel to a receiver which ...
Read more

The Williams Foolproof sight -- it really is!

Image
I have these classic micrometer peep sights on two rifles, at present, and they are good gear! This type of sight has been around approximately forever. The company makes numerous versions to fit a great many firearms. On some guns you will need a taller front sight when you install a peep sight but this is by no means true of all. It used to be old graybeards would look at my peep sighted rifle, nod approvingly and say to me, "See ya got a Foolproof. Good, good..." Now I am the graybeard saying that to younger folks. There is a great deal to approve of. The windage and elevation settings are finely adjustable. They ride on screw shafts and the setting have countable clicks and a visible index. Adjustments are supposed to be in minutes of angle and fractions, but of course that will vary with the length of the barrel, as a matter of simple geometry. Since I have this sight on a rifle that is longer than normal, and on another one shorter than normal, nothing works out to ev...
Read more